CVE-2026-91825: Auth Bypass

Description

Affected versions of MISP fail to authorize a submitted sharing group in a specific event-edit path. The vulnerable logic checked whether the acting user could use a sharing_group_id only when the request explicitly supplied distribution = 4. If the attacker instead omitted distribution but supplied a different sharing_group_id, that authorization branch was skipped. Later, MISP’s field-recovery logic restored the existing event distribution from storage. For events already configured with sharing-group distribution, the unauthorized sharing-group ID could therefore be saved. The fix adds authorization checks in both the controller and Event::_edit() whenever a non-empty sharing_group_id is supplied without distribution. The model now calls SharingGroup::checkIfAuthorised() before persisting the change. Version affected: ≤2.5.45

Is your site exposed to CVE-2026-91825?

Run a free security scan — no signup, results in seconds.

EPSS — Exploit Prediction

0.0024

Probability of exploitation

0.16%

Percentile rank

EPSS estimates the probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days. A higher score means more likely to be exploited.

Weakness Type (CWE)

CWE-862 Missing Authorization

References

Other References

https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/cf3ee4026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-91825? +

Affected versions of MISP fail to authorize a submitted sharing group in a specific event-edit path. The vulnerable logic checked whether the acting user could use a sharing_group_id only when the request explicitly supplied distribution = 4. If the attacker instead omitted distribution but supplied a different sharing_group_id, that authorization branch was skipped. Later, MISP’s field-recovery logic restored the existing event distribution from storage. For events already configured with sharing-group distribution, the unauthorized sharing-group ID could therefore be saved. The fix adds authorization checks in both the controller and Event::_edit() whenever a non-empty sharing_group_id is supplied without distribution. The model now calls SharingGroup::checkIfAuthorised() before persisting the change. Version affected: ≤2.5.45

How do I check if I'm vulnerable to CVE-2026-91825? +

You can use Secably's free Website Scanner to check your website for known vulnerabilities. For infrastructure scanning, use the Port Scanner to identify exposed services that may be affected. Check the vendor advisories linked above for specific patch and version information.

Related Vulnerabilities

CVE-2026-40570

FreeScout is a free self-hosted help desk and shared mailbox. Prior to version 1.8.213, the `load_customer_info` action in `POST /conversation/ajax` …

CVE-2026-42317

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 0.78 and prior to versions 10.0.25 and …

CVE-2026-4881

In affected versions of Octopus Server, permissions were not checked correctly resulting in any authenticated user being able to make …

CVE-2026-40543

SOPlanning does not enforce authorization for backup functionalities. An unauthenticated attacker can directly query backup-related endpoints and retrieve backup archives …

CVE-2026-10831

A denial-of-service vulnerability exists in NPort devices because of improper access control on the command port. The command interface does …

CVE-2026-40314

NamelessMC is website software for Minecraft servers. In version 2.2.4,`core/classes/Misc/ProfilePostReactionContext.php` only verifies that the wall post exists and does not …

CVE-2026-91825