Check whether a website is malware or phishing — live, against known-threat feeds and DNS blocklists. No signup, no API keys.
Checking against threat sources...
Daily scan limit reached
Sign up free to get 10 scans/day — or upgrade for unlimited access.
Redirecting to report...
A safe browsing check tells you if a website is known for malware or phishing before you visit or trust it. Secably checks the domain against the URLhaus and OpenPhish threat feeds and the Spamhaus DBL and SURBL DNS blocklists, then reviews the domain age and TLS certificate. You get a clear verdict and the exact sources behind it — free, no signup, no API keys.
Before you enter a password, download a file, or trust a link, it helps to know whether a site has a history of malware or phishing. The problem is that a website looking legitimate tells you almost nothing — attackers clone real login pages exactly.
A reputation check answers the practical question: has this domain already been reported as dangerous? Secably looks it up across independent, continuously-updated threat sources and shows you which — if any — flagged it, so you are not relying on a single opaque "safe/unsafe" badge.
A padlock only means the connection is encrypted — most phishing sites now use HTTPS with a free certificate. Encryption says nothing about who runs the site or what it does. That is why this tool checks reputation and threat listings, not just whether the certificate exists.
Every source is keyless and public. Nothing is invented — a domain is either listed or it isn't, and the report says which sources ran.
Matches the domain against URLhaus (abuse.ch malware URLs) and the OpenPhish community phishing feed, refreshed regularly on our server.
Queries Spamhaus DBL and SURBL live over DNS. Their answer codes separate spam, phishing, malware and botnet C&C domains.
Adds domain age (via RDAP), live TLS certificate validity, and detection of mixed-script lookalike (homograph) domains and abused TLDs.
Honest limitation: a "clean" result means the domain wasn't on any source we checked at scan time. Brand-new malicious sites are often not listed yet, so this is a reputation check, not a guarantee of safety. When a site is freshly registered or has other risk signals, we mark it suspicious even if no feed has caught it.