CVE-2026-90678
HIGHDescription
An issue was discovered in HAProxy 3.3.0 through 3.4.4 and in 3.5-dev1 through 3.5-dev5. Exploitation requires an HTTP/3 frontend: HAProxy must be built with QUIC support and configured with a QUIC bind listener, and the affected traffic must reach a backend over HTTP/1.1 using chunked transfer coding on a reused connection. Under those conditions, when an HTTP/3 request carries no Content-Length header, the HTTP/3 multiplexer credits the length declared in a DATA frame header to the stream endpoint's known-input-payload estimate at the moment the frame header is decoded, before the payload has been received, and that declared length is emitted verbatim as the HTTP/1.1 chunk size. A remote unauthenticated client that declares more payload than it delivers and then ends the stream causes HAProxy to announce a chunk larger than the bytes it writes and to return the connection to the idle pool in a desynchronized state. The result is potential HTTP request smuggling on reused backend connections: an attacker can place a request past a frontend rule such as a path-based http-request deny, so that the smuggled request is never seen by HAProxy's HTTP analysis, and can cause concurrent clients' requests, including their request lines and Authorization headers, to be consumed as the attacker's request body and lost. Exploitation is not deterministic; it depends on a race with backend connection pooling, succeeding in a majority of but not all trials during testing, and can be retried freely. The mechanism was introduced in 3.3-dev10; releases 3.2.x and earlier are unaffected.
Is your site exposed to CVE-2026-90678?
Run a free security scan — no signup, results in seconds.
CVSS v3.1 Score
EPSS — Exploit Prediction
EPSS estimates the probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days. A higher score means more likely to be exploited.
Weakness Type (CWE)
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-90678? +
How severe is CVE-2026-90678? +
How do I check if I'm vulnerable to CVE-2026-90678? +
Related Vulnerabilities
An improper handling of the length parameter inconsistency vulnerability has been identified in Moxa’s Secure Router. Because of improper validation …
In the silabser.sys driver for CP210x devices v11.5.0 and earlier, a local unprivileged user with a malicious device can use …
Improper bounds validation in EmberZNet SDK versions 9.0.2 and earlier may result in crashes or dynamic memory leakage.
websocket-driver is a WebSocket protocol handler with pluggable I/O. Prior to 0.7.5, the frame format in draft versions of the …
An attacker sending tcp, il, rudp, rudp, or gre packets with a length less than the header size would trigger …
Neo4j's Bolt modern handshake decoder treats an overlong capability bit mask the same way it treats a truncated bit mask. …