CVE-2026-12593

Description

The implementation of an internal and undocumented Dashboard API endpoint (POST /api/users/~/{user}/tokens) forgot to ensure an HTTP request for creating an API Token for another user had sufficient permission to do so. Precondition for successful exploitation was a preexisting internal user (with more privileges than the attacker), the attacker knowing its login name and the attacker being able to authenticate to the Dashboard via OAuth/OIDC. The attacker would then have had to forge a token creation API request on behalf of the other user and could have authenticated and finalized the token creation with their own OAuth/OIDC credentials. In the worst case, this would mean an attacker could have become Dashboard Administrator and been able to perform all administrative actions if the preexisting internal user had administrative privileges. In combination with a separate weakness, this could have further led to code execution on the host system running the Dashboard with the privileges of the OS-User running the Dashboard server.

Is your site exposed to CVE-2026-12593?

Run a free security scan — no signup, results in seconds.

Weakness Type (CWE)

CWE-862 Missing Authorization

References

Other References

https://wiki.qt.io/List_of_known_vulnerabilities_in_Qt_products#CVE-2026-12593

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-12593? +

The implementation of an internal and undocumented Dashboard API endpoint (POST /api/users/~/{user}/tokens) forgot to ensure an HTTP request for creating an API Token for another user had sufficient permission to do so. Precondition for successful exploitation was a preexisting internal user (with more privileges than the attacker), the attacker knowing its login name and the attacker being able to authenticate to the Dashboard via OAuth/OIDC. The attacker would then have had to forge a token creation API request on behalf of the other user and could have authenticated and finalized the token creation with their own OAuth/OIDC credentials. In the worst case, this would mean an attacker could have become Dashboard Administrator and been able to perform all administrative actions if the preexisting internal user had administrative privileges. In combination with a separate weakness, this could have further led to code execution on the host system running the Dashboard with the privileges of the OS-User running the Dashboard server.

How do I check if I'm vulnerable to CVE-2026-12593? +

You can use Secably's free Website Scanner to check your website for known vulnerabilities. For infrastructure scanning, use the Port Scanner to identify exposed services that may be affected. Check the vendor advisories linked above for specific patch and version information.

Related Vulnerabilities

CVE-2026-40570

FreeScout is a free self-hosted help desk and shared mailbox. Prior to version 1.8.213, the `load_customer_info` action in `POST /conversation/ajax` …

CVE-2026-42317

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 0.78 and prior to versions 10.0.25 and …

CVE-2026-4881

In affected versions of Octopus Server, permissions were not checked correctly resulting in any authenticated user being able to make …

CVE-2026-40543

SOPlanning does not enforce authorization for backup functionalities. An unauthenticated attacker can directly query backup-related endpoints and retrieve backup archives …

CVE-2026-10831

A denial-of-service vulnerability exists in NPort devices because of improper access control on the command port. The command interface does …

CVE-2026-60124

An authorization bypass in MISP’s EventsController::importModule() allowed authenticated users or read-only API keys with event view access to persist data …