CVE-2025-55001
MEDIUMDescription
OpenBao exists to provide a software solution to manage, store, and distribute sensitive data including secrets, certificates, and keys. In versions 2.3.1 and below, OpenBao allowed the assignment of policies and MFA attribution based upon entity aliases, chosen by the underlying auth method. When the username_as_alias=true parameter in the LDAP auth method was in use, the caller-supplied username was used verbatim without normalization, allowing an attacker to bypass alias-specific MFA requirements. This issue was fixed in version 2.3.2. To work around this, remove all usage of the username_as_alias=true parameter and update any entity aliases accordingly.
Is your site exposed to CVE-2025-55001?
Run a free security scan — no signup, results in seconds.
CVSS v3.1 Score
Weakness Type (CWE)
Affected Products
| Vendor | Product |
|---|---|
| openbao | openbao |
References
Advisories & Patches
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2025-55001? +
How severe is CVE-2025-55001? +
What products are affected by CVE-2025-55001? +
How do I check if I'm vulnerable to CVE-2025-55001? +
Related Vulnerabilities
OpenBao exists to provide a software solution to manage, store, and distribute sensitive data including secrets, certificates, and keys. In …
Vault and Vault Enterprise’s (“Vault”) TOTP Secrets Engine code validation endpoint is susceptible to code reuse within its validity period. …
Vault and Vault Enterprise’s (“Vault”) ldap auth method may not have correctly enforced MFA if username_as_alias was set to true …
HackerOne community member Dao Hoang Anh (yoyomiski) has reported an improper neutralization of whitespace in the username when adding new …
OpenBao exists to provide a software solution to manage, store, and distribute sensitive data including secrets, certificates, and keys. In …
OpenBao's AWS Plugin generates AWS access credentials based on IAM policies. Prior to version 0.1.1, the AWS Plugin is vulnerable …